They refer to the younger one as "cute little girl!" which is totally fine, but they then refer to the older adolescent as "tall, curvy teenager" and that's.questionable. So I can understand where they'd think that tapping into the literal growing market would be a good idea because it theoretically should appeal to every little girl, but somewhere along the line something went horribly, horribly wrong.įirst of all, let's just examine the wording of this image, shall we? For starters, we've got the very iffy wording choices that define both versions of the doll you get. See, girls are installation art, something to be looked at and discussed by anyone who ever sees them no matter the time or place. Growing up for girls is weird, and a lot of it has to do with not the changes we go through physically but more so the reactions to those changes, not just from ourselves but from everyone else around us. So, I'll admit it and say I get what they were going for here. Also I'm a toy blog, not a feminist blog, so there's also that. And I admit, I'm far from the first person to cover this topic, as feminist blogs far more worthy of praise have done it better than I will, but I still feel obligated to weigh in on it in some capacity. Now technically, this toy is from 1975, so while Barbie was indeed a popular toy amongst my peer group, this one was not because, well, I didn't grow up in 1975, so. This brings us to the first toy I'll be covering for this blog. Still, every now and then, I'd feel just a smidge bad for not buying into what the other girls were playing, yet in hindsight, I'm proud of myself and now ashamed of that shame, so. They knew I was weird and they let me revel in it, buying me Beast War action figures and sticky insects that clung to your window. Despite my family being pretty psychologically abusive, I have to give some credit where credit is due they didn't force any sort of role or stereotype on me. Not surprisingly, being a weirdo who liked bugs and ghosts, of course I didn't play with that sort of stuff. Pat.When I was a little girl, most girl toys were relegated to child rearing, play cooking or dolls of some kind or another. and Growing up Ginger: #9222 ©1967 Mattel, Inc. They are marked: #7259 Growing up Skipper: © 1967 Mattel Inc. She was only available in 1976, which makes her much harder to find on the secondary market, and especially in the box. In 1976, the brunette Growing Up Ginger was offered as well. In 1975 she had pale blonde colored hair, and when the 2nd version was available in 1976 she had slightly shorter, golden colored hair. Mattel received numerous letters from women’s groups and parents complaining about the doll and her ability to grow breasts. Once she was for sale in stores newspapers all over the country had a heyday writing articles about this Super Teen Skipper. The box she’s packaged in reads: 2 dolls in 1 for twice as much fun! She went from a cute little girl to a tall, curvy teenager, according to the packaging. Growing up Skipper debuted at the New York Toy Fair in February 1975. To return to a little girl, merely turn her arm all the way around clockwise. As you turn her arm her breasts would develop as well. In 19 Mattel released two interesting and controversial dolls: #7259 Growing Up Skipper, and #9222 Growing Up Ginger.īoth dolls had blue eyes and the ability to grow from 9 inches tall (9 ¼ inches was the height of the original Skipper) to 9 ¾ inches in height simply by turning her left arm all the way around counter clockwise.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |